ComparisonsMarvin vs Loxo
Marvin or Loxo?
What really sets them apart.
French suite for French-speaking agencies vs a US talent intelligence platform. Loxo ticks 10 of the 16 criteria in our grid. The gap comes down to 11 criteria, and further down we list where Loxo does better.
For: Growing agencies, search, staffing and RPO, mostly North AmericanKnown for: its sourcing database of 850 million profiles
IncludedPartialNot availableNot applicableNot publicly documented
Weighted score: a full dot counts 1, a half dot 0.5. A criterion the vendor does not document publicly is left out of both scores.In short
What you need to know.
Before the cell-by-cell detail.
Loxo, founded in 2012 in Austin, Texas, brings together sourcing, CRM, ATS, outreach and agentic AI on top of a proprietary database of 850M+ profiles, and claims 125,000+ recruiters. Its home ground is North America: US, UK and Australian job boards, interface and transcripts in English, invoicing and timesheets through partners. Marvin is built for French-speaking agencies: French job boards, LinkedIn and WhatsApp sequences, interview summaries in the language of the conversation, native timesheets and invoicing, data hosted in Paris.
Why Marvin over Loxo
What tips the decision.
Multi-posting to French job boards
Loxo documents US, UK and Australian job boards.LinkedIn and WhatsApp sequences
At Loxo, email and text message sequences, LinkedIn and WhatsApp messages not synced.Interview summaries in the language of the conversation
At Loxo, transcripts are always delivered in English.Data hosted in Paris
Loxo is a US publisher that does not publish its hosting region.
Features
All 17 criteria,
cell by cell.
IncludedPartialNot availableNot applicableNot publicly documented
Depending on your needs
When Loxo
may suit you better.
- Proprietary sourcing database of 850M+ profiles
- SOC 2 Type II certification and a wide integration library
- 4.6/5 from 134 Capterra reviews
Public reviews
Public reviews of Loxo.
Capterra: 4.6/5 from 134 reviews (seen 5 October 2026).
Read the reviews at the sourcePricing
What each tool costs.
Public prices, as of the review date.
From €129 per user per month excl. VAT (Pro) and €189 (Suite) billed annually; €159 and €239 billed monthly; 12-month commitment
Included with Marvin: multi-posting, AI Copilot, MCP server, missions, timesheets and invoicing; interview notes and Scout sourcing on the Suite planCore from $149, Professional from $199 / user / month, billed annually upfront; Enterprise on quote; 7-day trial
If you switch
We handle the move.
No starting your database over.
Your full database, migrated.
Candidates, clients, assignmentsFree with annual billing (worth €1,500).Duplicate cleanup included.
LinkedIn, email, phonePart of the migration.Qualiopi-certified training.
Training for your teamWorth €2,500, eligible for OPCO funding in France.A dedicated CSM.
Throughout onboarding
Sources
Where these cells come from.
- Loxo — pricing (checked 5 October 2026)
- Loxo — home page (checked 5 October 2026)
- Loxo — job boards (checked 5 October 2026)
- Loxo — outreach (checked 5 October 2026)
- Loxo — AI Notetaker (checked 5 October 2026)
- Loxo — Xero integration (checked 5 October 2026)
- Loxo — DPA (checked 5 October 2026)
- Capterra — Loxo reviews (checked 5 October 2026)
Last reviewed: 5 October 2026
Other comparisons:Marvin vs JarviMarvin vs SpottMarvin vs BoondmanagerMarvin vs HubSpotMarvin vs VincereMarvin vs HiresweetMarvin vs TeamTailorMarvin vs Tool for StaffingMarvin vs EoliaMarvin vs Ad-MenMarvin vs LeonarMarvin vs ProfilioMarvin vs Recruit CRMMarvin vs RecruiterflowMarvin vs Nicoka CABSMarvin vs JobaffinityMarvin vs BullhornMarvin vs JobAdderMarvin vs FirefishMarvin vs Access Recruitment CRMMarvin vs EzekiaMarvin vs Atlas
Compare on the real thing.
Your data, 30 minutes.