ComparisonsMarvin vs Leonar
Marvin or Leonar?
What really sets them apart.
All-in-one suite for agencies and contracting vs an AI-first ATS/CRM for agencies. Leonar ticks 11 of the 15 criteria in our grid. The gap comes down to 8 criteria, and further down we list where Leonar does better.
For: Recruitment agencies and executive search firmsKnown for: its openness to AI assistants and its clear pricing
IncludedPartialNot availableNot applicableNot publicly documented
Weighted score: a full dot counts 1, a half dot 0.5. A criterion the vendor does not document publicly is left out of both scores.In short
What you need to know.
Before the cell-by-cell detail.
Leonar, published in Paris by Licorne Society, is an AI-first ATS + CRM used by more than 400 recruitment agencies: candidates, clients and deals in one workspace, AI sourcing and matching, multichannel sequences (email, WhatsApp, text messages), an MCP server and API included, with a public price and a free trial. Marvin shares that core (ATS, CRM, AI, MCP, hosting in France) and differs on three points: multi-posting is part of the subscription and AI interview notes are part of the Suite plan, LinkedIn steps in sequences run automatically, and the back office of agencies that also place contractors (missions, timesheets, day-rate invoicing) lives in the same tool.
Why Marvin over Leonar
What tips the decision.
Multi-posting included in the subscription
At Leonar, an optional paid module with an ad quota.Automated LinkedIn steps in sequences, with calibrated quotas
At Leonar, every LinkedIn action is done manually by the recruiter, a deliberate choice by the publisher.AI interview notes included in the Suite plan
At Leonar, an add-on from €15 to €39 per user per month.Missions, contractor timesheets and day-rate invoices
Not documented at Leonar.
Features
All 17 criteria,
cell by cell.
IncludedPartialNot availableNot applicableNot publicly documented
Depending on your needs
When Leonar
may suit you better.
- A monthly plan with no commitment and a free trial, no call needed
- No LinkedIn automation: every action is done by hand, a cautious choice for recruiters’ accounts
Pricing
What each tool costs.
Public prices, as of the review date.
From €129 per user per month excl. VAT (Pro) and €189 (Suite) billed annually; €159 and €239 billed monthly; 12-month commitment
Included with Marvin: multi-posting, AI Copilot, MCP server, missions, timesheets and invoicing; interview notes and Scout sourcing on the Suite planProfessional plan: €119 / user / month exc. VAT prepaid annually, €139 with an annual commitment paid monthly, €159 monthly with no commitment; free trial; add-ons: note-taker (€15 to €39) and multi-posting (on quote)
If you switch
We handle the move.
No starting your database over.
Your full database, migrated.
Candidates, clients, assignmentsFree with annual billing (worth €1,500).Duplicate cleanup included.
LinkedIn, email, phonePart of the migration.Qualiopi-certified training.
Training for your teamWorth €2,500, eligible for OPCO funding in France.A dedicated CSM.
Throughout onboarding
Sources
Where these cells come from.
- Leonar — pricing (checked 5 October 2026)
- Leonar — multi-posting (checked 5 October 2026)
- Leonar — multichannel outreach (checked 5 October 2026)
- Leonar — AI note-taker (checked 5 October 2026)
- Leonar — ATS for headhunters (checked 5 October 2026)
- Leonar — executive search and client portal (checked 5 October 2026)
- Leonar — MCP server (checked 5 October 2026)
- Leonar — privacy and hosting (checked 5 October 2026)
Last reviewed: 5 October 2026
Other comparisons:Marvin vs JarviMarvin vs SpottMarvin vs BoondmanagerMarvin vs HubSpotMarvin vs VincereMarvin vs HiresweetMarvin vs TeamTailorMarvin vs Tool for StaffingMarvin vs EoliaMarvin vs Ad-MenMarvin vs ProfilioMarvin vs Recruit CRMMarvin vs RecruiterflowMarvin vs Nicoka CABSMarvin vs JobaffinityMarvin vs LoxoMarvin vs BullhornMarvin vs JobAdderMarvin vs FirefishMarvin vs Access Recruitment CRMMarvin vs EzekiaMarvin vs Atlas
Compare on the real thing.
Your data, 30 minutes.